It’s runnable in a cab with adapters. Short version: Overall It’s not better than groovymame. Nowhere near. Mame is the result of decades of work now.
There’s a few things I really like about it.
• It’s low powered and inherently very optimised.
• From what I’ve read there are some cases where shortcuts have been used but with behaviour that is entirely accurate for purpose. I’m not at all qualified to argue with anyone but while many processors are technically emulated, the result to a user *can* still be better accuracy. I have read that CPS1 on MISTer runs at correct speed, which Mame has never quite managed due to a wait state issue (look up Hyper Fighting bug reports).
• Lag. Near enough a non-issue on groovymame but a very substantial one with alternate low-powered devices that run retro arch. As this is all running at hardware level There’s no OS graphics drivers / framebuffers to worry about - not to mention audio. And on this note, no frame-tethered input drivers. It’s another minor point but using Mame can sometimes fudge up complicated fast inputs.
• Community drive. There are a lot of very talented developers that are working very hard on this. It’s quite an exciting thing to follow progress on / it makes me nostalgic for early Mame news
It’s hard to talk about alternatives without offending Mame. I’ve seen those threads! Mame is probably my favourite produce from the internet. It’s an incredible example beyond my comprehension of what can and is being achieved with an open source project.
MISTer is a very interesting alternative. It’s early days but I feel it’s potential is very exciting and I’m very impressed with what FPGAs have done for old video game hardware so far, like the one in my SD2SNES.
(Sorry. My inner dork popped out)