Varnish connoisseurs

Share something OT or put the world to rights!
Topics are pruned after 5 years of inactivity.
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

kernow wrote: January 14th, 2019, 8:54 pm I want the ear acute classic :(
Have you heard one? Stereophile didn’t seem impressed.
User avatar
thegreathopper
Geese's Bodyguard
Posts: 1733
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:56 pm
Location: London
eBay: thegreathopper
Initials: STV

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by thegreathopper »

kernow wrote: January 14th, 2019, 8:54 pm I want the ear acute classic :(
But I'd still need to feed it somehow with Spotify - seems a joke putting that into it
I have been using Tidal for the past half a year or so, try putting that in.. I was very pleasantly surprised with it especially the hires Masters stuff.
User avatar
thegreathopper
Geese's Bodyguard
Posts: 1733
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:56 pm
Location: London
eBay: thegreathopper
Initials: STV

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by thegreathopper »

I had a RME dac for a few weeks which sounded great, but I found the control setup and remote awful... pretty sure all these good DACs sound great, I have a Beresford and a Stealth Emotiva they all sound good.

It’s all about the room 8-)
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

thegreathopper wrote: January 14th, 2019, 11:04 pm I have been using Tidal for the past half a year or so, try putting that in.. I was very pleasantly surprised with it especially the hires Masters stuff.
Was this through an MQA capable DAC? The Hugo doesn't fully "unfold" the file. I hear no difference. There's a fair bit of controversy surrounding MQA!
thegreathopper wrote: January 15th, 2019, 8:19 am It’s all about the room 8-)
True. My system will always be held back by my room and the compromises I'm not willing to make. Room correction software isn't an option as I play vinyl. Still sounds great though.
User avatar
thegreathopper
Geese's Bodyguard
Posts: 1733
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:56 pm
Location: London
eBay: thegreathopper
Initials: STV

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by thegreathopper »

It was just with my MacBook Pro via USB to the Chord TT DAC, the hi-res files sounded great but I wonder how much of that is the mastering.

I sort of ignored the MQA bit :D I dont notice a huge difference between Tidal and Spotify but two recording studio guys I work with say they can hear a big difference.

My main listening source is a NAS drive where I stored all my CD's in ALAC,.. Sonos doesn't like WAV works great with the Sonos connect.
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

thegreathopper wrote: January 15th, 2019, 11:51 am It was just with my MacBook Pro via USB to the Chord TT DAC, the hi-res files sounded great but I wonder how much of that is the mastering.
I think they would've been playing in 48KHz 24bit instead of the full 192KHz "unfolded" version you'd get with an MQA DAC. I'd suggest you like the mastering and I'd be amazed if you could hear a difference with the same master at 44/16.

I have Tidal. Lossless definitely sounds better than lossy on a good system. High res is a bit more debatable and MQA is arguably a lossy DRM gimmick. There's a lengthy article on this on Computer Audiophile I can't be arsed to read. The quality of the mastering is far more important.
User avatar
CTN
Please Continue...
Posts: 986
Joined: March 17th, 2011, 2:17 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany / Istanbul, Turkey
eBay: ctn2005
Initials: CTN

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by CTN »

MQA has no benefit for us users. It only reduces the file size on a server farm. I see no point on paying a premium for such a DAC.

I also would never ever pay for Spotify. One spot every hour is still much fewer commercials compared to private radio.
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

User avatar
markedkiller78
Pony fucker
Posts: 7610
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:53 pm
Location: Glasgow
eBay: markedkiller78
Initials: MAL

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by markedkiller78 »

:lol:
Image
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

Nice.
My Project phono stage keeps getting pushed back in the upgrade list as it just sounds great. Punches above it’s weight.

Have you thought about trying a Schiit DAC?

Team SME IV signing in...

Image
User avatar
markedkiller78
Pony fucker
Posts: 7610
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:53 pm
Location: Glasgow
eBay: markedkiller78
Initials: MAL

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by markedkiller78 »

I just snapped the stylus on my cart :palm:

I sold my gyrodec and bought a much cheaper one. Was in the process of servicing it and the needle snagged on my glove :problem: it didn’t have a stylus guard.

What a tit I am.

Not to worry, it’s only £360 for a replacement :oops: I’m not buying the same needle. I’ll go for something much cheaper.

^nice arm pang. 8-)
Image
User avatar
yosai
Windy City
Posts: 4077
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 5:00 pm
Location: London
eBay: yosai

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by yosai »

:lolno:

If there is one thing you shouldn't skimp on its the stylus/cart. The rest of it make **** all difference to the sound quality.
User avatar
markedkiller78
Pony fucker
Posts: 7610
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:53 pm
Location: Glasgow
eBay: markedkiller78
Initials: MAL

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by markedkiller78 »

I’m glad someone lold :problem:

It was a Goldring 2500. TBH I wasn’t that impressed with it, but I’ve changed everything so **** knows what I don’t like.

Anyway, the 2100-2300 have the exact same stylus, the 2400 and 2500 are different. I’m going to stick the 2100 stylus in the 2500 cart and see how it sounds. I got a new 2100 for £100. My stylus guard will be here by the time arrives too.

If I’m spending £400+ on a cart (I’m not) I’d rather buy MC than MM. This is meant to be a budget system :roll:

Any recommendations for a decent, not too expensive cart? It’s a Rega RB300 arm. I’ve still got the same phono stage, so it can handle pretty much anything MC or MM
Image
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

Some say the Ortofon 2M black is better than many MC carts at the price.
kernow wrote: April 26th, 2019, 12:09 am I want something that will sort of match the rest of the kit too. Tricky
I've come to the conclusion that you shouldn't try to make your digital kit sound the same as your analogue kit otherwise you're holding one of the two back. They should sound different. Each have their strengths. There are some albums I prefer to listen to on vinyl, some I prefer to listen to on the streamer.
User avatar
cools
Armed Police Buttrider
Posts: 13591
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 4:49 pm
Location: Wales, United Kingdom
eBay: hordarian
Initials: CLS

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by cools »

I'd put money on matching being in looks, not sound...
Image
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

:lol: Oh, right. :palm:
User avatar
SuperPang
Master or universe
Posts: 11183
Joined: August 16th, 2008, 2:45 pm
Location: UK
eBay: *_*
Initials: JOE

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by SuperPang »

kernow wrote: April 26th, 2019, 12:39 pm Is that a Gert pedersen armboard mod on there too. Can't tell
That made a big difference for 90euros
It is indeed.
User avatar
markedkiller78
Pony fucker
Posts: 7610
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:53 pm
Location: Glasgow
eBay: markedkiller78
Initials: MAL

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by markedkiller78 »

I obviously replaced it with another one within a month :palm:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image
User avatar
thegreathopper
Geese's Bodyguard
Posts: 1733
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 6:56 pm
Location: London
eBay: thegreathopper
Initials: STV

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by thegreathopper »

You guys washing your records? I recently bought a Klaudio record cleaner (for work) and was quite shocked in a before and after listening session.

Some of the LP’s were old and quite worn, Pink Floyd and Bowie sounded great after a good wash.
User avatar
yosai
Windy City
Posts: 4077
Joined: August 17th, 2008, 5:00 pm
Location: London
eBay: yosai

Re: Varnish connoisseurs

Post by yosai »

I've only ever cleaned one of my records and used wood glue for that. Results were :awe: